Abuse scenarios discovered after a feature has shipped.
Threat Modeling
Use product design and data flows to identify credible abuse paths early. Workshops produce decisions engineers can act on, rather than a list of generic threats.
Focus area
Diagram actors, assets, and data movement
Focus area
Identify abuse cases and trust boundary failures
Focus area
Prioritize mitigations with product owners
Primary output
Threat model
Product teams making decisions about credible abuse paths
For product, engineering, and security teams making design decisions before a feature or integration becomes costly to change.
- Threat model
- Mitigation decisions
- Review triggers for future changes
Problems to address
Teams using different assumptions about data sensitivity and trusted actors.
Include administrative access, external services, data exposure, and failure behavior. A threat model is a working design aid and needs updates as the product evolves.
How We Work
- 01
Scope & Authorization
Draw the relevant data flows, actors, assets, and trust boundaries together.
- 02
Architecture & Evidence
Explore realistic misuse scenarios and rank the resulting risks in context.
- 03
Assessment & Findings
Facilitate threat workshops and map realistic abuse cases to engineering mitigations.
- 04
Remediation & Verification
Review attack scenarios with engineers and check that proposed controls address each selected threat.
- 05
Handover & Follow-up
Maintain the model with product changes, new integrations, and revised trust boundaries.
Technologies We Master
Candidate technologies and tools for threat modeling. The final selection follows discovery, existing systems, and agreed operating requirements.
- OWASP ASVSReview criteria
- OWASP ZAPApplication testing
- SemgrepCode analysis
- Dependency scanningSupply chain
- Access logsEvidence
Security Built Around This Service
Each engagement is shaped around the risks, data flows, access patterns, and operational realities of threat modeling.
Strong Domain Knowledge
Scope covers threat modeling in the context of existing systems, user responsibilities, and operational constraints. For product, engineering, and security teams making design decisions before a feature or integration becomes costly to change.
Security Controls Built In
Address unexamined abuse paths across identities and data boundaries through explicit access boundaries, review checkpoints, and verification criteria.
Business-Aligned Protection
Review attack scenarios with engineers and check that proposed controls address each selected threat.
Operational Readiness
Maintain the model with product changes, new integrations, and revised trust boundaries.
Insights for Threat Modeling
Selected security and engineering articles to help inform the next project decision.
JadePuffer: Agentic Ransomware Changes the Ransomware Threat Model
Sysdig's JadePuffer research shows how an AI agent can chain reconnaissance, credential theft, lateral movement, persistence, and database destruction into a complete extortion workflow.
Jul 7, 2026BioShocking Shows Why AI Browsers Need Security Boundaries
LayerX's BioShocking research shows that agentic browsers can be manipulated through context, turning authenticated tabs and repositories into potential exfiltration targets.
Jul 7, 2026Secure Development Practices for Modern Applications
Building security into your software from the start is crucial. Explore secure coding practices, OWASP guidelines, and tools to help you develop safer applications.
Dec 10, 2025Frequently asked questions
Do we need a finished system?
No. Early diagrams and intended workflows can support a first session. Uncertain design choices should be recorded as assumptions to revisit.
Is threat modeling only for security teams?
No. Product owners and engineers provide the workflow and implementation context needed to make the result useful.
Discuss your service requirements
Share the workflow, systems, and constraints involved so we can discuss a suitable scope and next steps.
Book a Consultation